I do not support the death penalty in any way. It is inhumane and barbaric. How can we tell society that it is wrong to kill someone by killing people. With that said, I do understand
some of the reasons why people do support it.
I have had this debate with many of my friends, all different ages, genders, religions, and political affiliations. The most effective argument I have heard any of them say is that it is cheaper for us as Americans. Why should we pay for these murderers and rapist to live? I have a friend who works in a jail, so he sees first hand what our tax dollars are going to. Prisoners get treated better than they should. They get considerably good food and health care when there are people in our country starving to death and dying because they can't afford the surgery they need. There are accounts of people purposefully getting arrested so they have a meal to eat and a bed to sleep in.
I believe that there is one simple solution to this. End the death penalty, and in it's place put life in solitude without parole. A human being needs companionship. The human cannot function completely on it's own. Even those who enjoy being alone cannot stand to be fully isolated from all life forms. It is the worst possible way to live. They should not be fed very well, just what they need to survive. There is no reason for them to have any extra luxuries. They can live their lives with only their thoughts to keep them company. I fully believe that this is the perfect replacement of the death penalty.
When debating the death penalty I purposefully do not include my faith. I don't think it is smart to argue about an issue with religion in this day and age. Non Catholics are not going to listen to Catholics, non Jews are not going to listen to Jews, and so on. I can say as a Catholic that I believe the death penalty is wrong and immoral, but a non Catholic does not care about my Catholic values. Not only that, but people often come off in a snobbish, high and mighty way when they justify their beliefs through a religion. This article sounded very absolute. It was as if the Catholics are saying "I'm right and your wrong", which is not true. Everyone has their own opinions, and opinions cannot be right or wrong.
I do agree with this article on the basis of banning capital punishment, but I do not agree on the ways they are trying to communicate their opinions. One quote that jumped out at me and really made me angry is on the fourth page, "In fact, such use of the bible (finding a "proof text"to affirm one's point of view) us inappropriate". I literally laughed out loud when I read this. The Church uses quotes from the Bible every time it can, for issues from gay marriage to abortion, but the one time they can't find a quote that fits their use, they say it is irrelevant. Funny.
I did agree with the article when it said "we cannot teach that killing is wrong by killing...This cycle of violence diminished all of use-especially our children". Children are always listening. How can we teach the future of America that it is okay to kill people if they've killed people? The cycle will never end this way. While I often disagree with how this article goes about expressing their opinion, I do agree with the big picture, end capitol punishment.